It appears that we should start setting up a system whereby everyone gets their TILP paper reviewed by two other folks on our team. I guess we should have a system, otherwise we might end up with one person not having two people to review their paper unless someone else reviews more than 2.
I know that didn't make sense.
The only idea I had was to put down numbers for review and I came up with this:
Person 1 reviews 2 & 3
Person 2 reviews 4 & 5
Person 3 reviews 1 & 2
Person 4 reviews 3 & 5
Person 5 reviews 1 & 4
Thoughts?
I posted this on our group space as well because I'm not sure which place is the best for ensuring everyone sees the message.
This page doesn't have to stay here - just trying to get consensus on how we will do the next project and I'm not sure if email, Blackboard, or here is the most efficient/effective means.
Posted on 9/28 (here and on our group page in Blackboard):
hmmm...I think there is some confusion or something - most likely on my part
Here's what we said on the wikispace:
Person 1 reviews 2 & 3
Person 2 reviews 4 & 5
Person 3 reviews 1 & 2
Person 4 reviews 3 & 5
Person 5 reviews 1 & 4
Mel - #1
Monica - #2
Dan - #3
Chris - #4
Jan - #5
So that would mean:
Mel gets Monica's and Dan's
Monica gets Chris' and Jan's
Dan gets Mel's and Monica's
Chris gets Dan's and Jan's
Jan gets Mel's and Chris'
I know it doesn't really matter who reviews who as long as everyone reviews two - so far, I (Jan) have Dan's but Dan forwarded me his paper from an email from Mel that seemed to say that she had already sent hers. Mel, if you sent it to me, I didn't get it. Earlier today, I sent Monica and Chris my paper - did you guys get it?
It appears that we should start setting up a system whereby everyone gets their TILP paper reviewed by two other folks on our team. I guess we should have a system, otherwise we might end up with one person not having two people to review their paper unless someone else reviews more than 2.
I know that didn't make sense.
The only idea I had was to put down numbers for review and I came up with this:
Person 1 reviews 2 & 3
Person 2 reviews 4 & 5
Person 3 reviews 1 & 2
Person 4 reviews 3 & 5
Person 5 reviews 1 & 4
Thoughts?
I posted this on our group space as well because I'm not sure which place is the best for ensuring everyone sees the message.
This page doesn't have to stay here - just trying to get consensus on how we will do the next project and I'm not sure if email, Blackboard, or here is the most efficient/effective means.
Posted on 9/28 (here and on our group page in Blackboard):
hmmm...I think there is some confusion or something - most likely on my part
Here's what we said on the wikispace:
Person 1 reviews 2 & 3
Person 2 reviews 4 & 5
Person 3 reviews 1 & 2
Person 4 reviews 3 & 5
Person 5 reviews 1 & 4
Mel - #1
Monica - #2
Dan - #3
Chris - #4
Jan - #5
So that would mean:
Mel gets Monica's and Dan's
Monica gets Chris' and Jan's
Dan gets Mel's and Monica's
Chris gets Dan's and Jan's
Jan gets Mel's and Chris'
I know it doesn't really matter who reviews who as long as everyone reviews two - so far, I (Jan) have Dan's but Dan forwarded me his paper from an email from Mel that seemed to say that she had already sent hers. Mel, if you sent it to me, I didn't get it. Earlier today, I sent Monica and Chris my paper - did you guys get it?